Thank you to all who participated.

We had AI summarise your views.

Looking forward to see you all at the next evening.
Martin & Jon

 

HAS LOVE CHANGE SINCE OUR GRANDPARENT'S ERA?

 

Male Perspective

Men consistently frame modern love as something shaped and pressured by social change. They describe a shift from stability to instability: modern relationships fracture more easily because people no longer rely on others for security, chase desire and immediacy, or operate under the old social constraints that once held couples together. They see love as something that requires maturity, commitment, and time, qualities they believe society now undermines. Many men distinguish love from desire, noting that desire fuels but does not define love, and complain that modern culture pushes people toward hedonism, choices, and benchmarking rather than depth. Despite this, they consider love eternal in essence, rooted in security, connection, and a nobility of spirit, even if the modern world makes it harder to sustain.

 

Female Perspective
Women consistently describe modern love as a fundamental, timeless, and deeply human emotion: kindness, connection, intuition, truth, and inner certainty. They emphasize love’s purity and universality while acknowledging that social expectations and freedoms have changed, not love itself. Many highlight that modern women have more choice, autonomy, and personal agency, which changes the form of relationships but not the feeling. They describe love as something that endures across centuries yet is now lived more freely, more honestly, and with higher standards. Several note that effort, communication, and authenticity matter more than conformity. For women, love remains a powerful internal compass, a feeling rooted in dreams, sincerity, and humanity, unbroken even as society evolves around it.

 

In one sentence
Men believe society has weakened modern love; women believe society has freed modern love to be more genuine.